A Diminishing Republic Ruled by way of Obama, or with the aid of Law?

If you had been an American law enforcement officer, said a metropolis police officer, sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution and your State Constitution and implement your State’s penal code. You knew of a conspiracy being hatched to rob a bank in your town, might you put together to arrest the perpetrators before they robbed the bank and brought critical harm to innocent human beings? Moreover, if you knew that the perpetrators had been regarded as criminals with lengthy rap-sheets filled with crimes and misdemeanors, would you try to act promptly to keep the crime from taking place? Yet, what if your watch commander and, even, your police leader, informed you to face-down when you pronounced to them the incontrovertible statistics approximately the upcoming crime, whilst it changed into going to occur, how it’d happen, and the specific day and time? However, what if they advised you that it didn’t count the number and to neglect it?

Law.jpg (2000×1000)

To answer those poignant questions, I will expressly point to an editorial that seemed on the front-page of August 2, 2014, a version of the “Washington Post” entitled, “Obama readies government movement on immigration.” This article, coming from about the most Marxist propagandizing newspaper in the USA, flippantly published this excuse for journalism with the identical contempt for the U.S. Constitution as they did when they introduced that the brilliant (unlawful) bill, Obamacare, changed into on the President’s desk for signature. The article ought to have, as an alternative, be well entitled, “Obama plans high-crime to issue the unlawful and unconstitutional government order granting amnesty to denigrate the U.S. Constitution further. Why is that this so?

Well, the most compelling purpose is that govt orders aren’t cited in the U.S. Constitution. They are an abstruse creation of the U.S. Supreme Court. In any manner, article 2 does not supply the President authority to hold the legislative, executive, and judicial powers in a single hand, and a bull-whip in the different. As a chief government, the President has only the precise energy to trouble directives, now not legal guidelines, that affect the government branch employees’ running status. He has no power to unilaterally create a law (tantamount to a U.S. Statute or code), to define and interpret its prison reputation, and to put in force it. That is the right definition of pure tyranny.

Remember the notorious executive order issued via the first real American fuhrer, Franklin D. Roosevelt. In contrast, in overdue 1941, he ordered that each one of the harmless Japanese-Americans is rounded up and imprisoned in internment camps? That order changed into later dominated as unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court, as it has to had been before it became issued. That order turned into responsible for over a hundred deaths in those internment camps and ruined pretty a few human lives. Something very lousy, after 1929, happened to the general public of the American people when they had been uncovered to the severe adversity of a Depression deliberately engineered by the Federal Reserve, in 1927, while it secretly ordered that 1/three of the paper and coin money is circulating be taken out of flow incrementally (Economist Milton Friedman set up this fact).

By 1929, the banks’ runs and financial savings and loans inside the nation had been forthcoming. Then, when it took place, the USA’s People buckled to socialism, government regulation, and the philosophies of John Maynard Keynes, which were implemented through FDR in his unconstitutional New Deal. The People surrendered their treasured liberty and freedom to the federal government for some temporary bodily protection, wondering that FDR became a savior instead of the demon he becomes. At that time, some American constitutional patriots who fought Roosevelt, however, via FDR’s deceitful conspiracy and collusion, demonstrated detailed historical studies; they lost the combat.

A Diminishing Republic Ruled by way of Obama, or with the aid of Law? 1

The first executive order changed into pretty, rendered with the aid of right antique President George Washington. At the same time, he took it upon himself to do Congress’s task via ordering the construction of the first federal mint. Congress should have tongue-lashed Washington and informed him by no means to assume legislative energy that rightfully belongs to the Congress. Nonetheless, Washington turned into no longer reprimanded (he became, for some purpose, extolled) for his usurpation of the U.S. Constitution, and a precedent turned into unconstitutionally set that a President has the energy to issue “govt orders.” Yet, the antique, but actual, aphorism, “supply them an inch, and they’ll take a mile,” became exemplified by that happening and has been evermore genuine within the passage of history because that first unlawful order was given.

Now, getting returned to unlawful immigration, there are legal guidelines, U.S. Codes, which have been exceeded using plural (Democratic and Republican) Congresses, and signed via status U.S. Presidents, going returned to Harry Truman, which make illegal immigration into America, across U.S. Borders, a criminal offense, and actionable by way of federal regulation enforcement. According to standing law, any federal regulation enforcement officer can intervene within the commission of a federal crime, together with financial institution theft, kidnapping, shoplifting, and illegal immigration. If they deliberately do not interfere all through robberies or kidnappings, they can not use, as an excuse for not intervening, that it turned into no longer his or her jurisdiction. This applies to all federal law enforcement officers, the FBI, the U.S. Marshall’s Service, the DEA, the ATF, and so forth. For instance, if an armed, or unarmed, U.S. Border Patrol officer or INS (ICE) agent witnesses a financial institution theft, a kidnapping, an act of shoplifting in DC, or an act of unlawful immigration, he, or she, has the authority to intervene, to prevent the crime, and to arrest the perpetrators. If an FBI agent, perhaps, witnesses a van-load of unlawful aliens, from Tijuana, Mexico, unloading in Chula Vista, California, he has the jurisdiction to interfere and arrest the extraterrestrial beings and flip them over to the U.S. Border Patrol. This is most straightforward as affordable as the duty of a deputy sheriff to have the jurisdiction to put into effect any, and all, kingdom legal guidelines in any city in that county where the local police are not witnesses to crimes which are devoted. The object of regulation enforcement, federal, state, and local, is to maintain the public peace and protection for the citizens of the States who’re American citizens, thru the proper enforcement of all legal guidelines, federal, state, and nearby, legislated and enacted for the general public properly. When those legal guidelines are deliberately not enforced, the peace and protection of the People, for which these legal guidelines have been supposed, diminishes in proportion to the diminution of regulation. I agree that that is what the Honorable John Adams intended while he solemnly stated, “We are a state of laws and no longer of fellows.”

So, inside the starting of this essay, I requested what you, an American peace officer, would do if you knew that a sordid federal crime, a legal, has been planned, and while it became going to be perpetrated. If you furthermore might know that the federal regulation enforcement officers, sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution and implement all status federal legal guidelines, have been going to stand by and allow the crime to be dedicated, what could you do? I have some buddies who are federal regulation enforcement officers, FBI and U.S. Border Patrol, and some Department of Justice attorneys. And you recognize what? They don’t deliver a diddly-squat approximately whether or not excessive-crimes are being committed via the U.S. President, and what a shame it’s far! This federal fats-cats are much greater interested in maintaining an unlawful repute quo for you to continue getting their paychecks and retirements than in law guidelines. All of them are bowing to their boss, Eric Holder, and pronouncing to him, “You’re a command, which is your fuhrer’s command, is my preference to enforce.” Would you, a sworn peace officer, throw-up your fingers and say, “There’s nothing I can do?” Or could you do something, possibly something a piece drastic?

law5.jpg (3008×1969)

Of route, what you’ll have to do is first conclude as to whether or not the issuance of an unconstitutional executive order is largely tantamount to the fee of a bank robbery, murder, or kidnapping? For a second, let’s go return to FDR and recollect a blatant correlation that cries out for recognition. When that fascist President illegally ordered the internment of over one million Japanese-Americans, U.S. Residents, and a number of those human beings died in the course of their detention, changed into that order tantamount to a felony? Were those deaths the result of the fee of involuntary manslaughter, or murder with the aid of Roosevelt’s henchmen? When American residents without delay go through, to the point of demise, thru the issuance of unconstitutional executive orders, should not something drastic be performed? Will Obama’s order to offer amnesty to unlawful extraterrestrial beings, in direct violation of federal law, the reason the People of the US (the citizens of your State) suffer from crime, loss of jobs, and deliberately engineered social disorder (70 percent of the violent crimes in San Diego are committed using Hispanic unlawful extraterrestrial beings)? My opinion is, and could for all time be, that once the status federal, kingdom, or local laws are discounted, negated, unnoticed and unenforced by way of the chief law enforcement officers and their direct enforcers, anarchy will preside, which requires that system, permitting such absence of law, to be abolished. A brand new machine instituted a good way to make certain the blessings of liberty and freedom for the People. This is most effective the recourse stated in that blessed record that turned into the American republican government’s inspiration, the Declaration of Independence.

Leah Leonard

Coffee expert. Troublemaker. Typical music guru. Friendly beer fanatic. Introvert. Web specialist. Uniquely-equipped for implementing bullwhips in Ocean City, NJ. Spent a year importing licorice in Hanford, CA. Have some experience licensing cigarettes for the government. Once had a dream of selling toy monkeys in Las Vegas, NV. Spent the 80's working on hula hoops in Minneapolis, MN. What gets me going now is working with action figures in the government sector.

Related Articles

Back to top button