Some basic premises – regularly long-established with the aid of leaders and supported by means of the led – exercise the collective moral sense of the led into date as they stimulate a willed development. The development is commonly superior but not always civilized. The premises in the query are of this shape: “Our degree of technological development is second to none. Upon reaching this stage, we additionally need to prepare our society for peace and to guarantee the peace, generation should be revised to foster the policy of battle.” Technological development this is driven in this course units a risky precedent for different societies that worry a chance to their respective sovereignties. They are pushed to also foster a conflict generation.
In the domain of civilization, this mode of improvement is not praiseworthy, nor is it morally justifiable. Since it isn’t always morally justifiable, it is socially irresponsible. An inspection of the premises will reveal that it’s miles the ultimate one which poses a hassle. The remaining premise is the conclusion of preceding premises but isn’t always in any manner logically deduced. What it indicates is a passionately deduced end, and being so, it fails to be reckoned as an end from a rationally prepared mind, at least at the time at which it became deduced.
A society that advances consistent with the above presuppositions – and in particular in step with the illogical conclusion – has transmitted the psyche of non-negotiable superiority to its humans. All along, the electricity of passion dictates the tempo of human behavior. Whether in positive engagements or willed partnerships, the precept of equality fails to paintings exactly because of the superiority syndrome that grips the leader and the led. And a special society that refuses to proportion within the collective sensibilities or passion of such society has, by the anticipated logic, emerge as a potential or real enemy and faces war of words on all feasible fronts.
Most of what we find out about the existing global, of the route, thru the media, is dominated by present-day generation. Societies that have the most of such technology are also, time and again, claimed to be the most superior. It isn’t always handiest their advancement that lifts them to the top of electricity, superiority, and fame. They can also use era to simplify and pass ahead an knowledge of existence and nature in a different path, a route that has a tendency to cast off, as lots as feasible, a previous connection between life and nature that changed into, in lots of respects, mystical and unsafe. This remaining point does no longer always imply that technological advancement is a mark of a superior civilization.
What we need to recognize is that civilization and technology are not conjugal phrases. Civilized people may have a sophisticated generation or they’ll no longer have it. Civilization is not just a remember of technology and technology or technical infrastructure, or, once more, the wonder of homes; it also has to do with the ethical and intellectual reflexes of humans as well as their stage of social connectedness inside their personal society and past. It is from the general behavior makeup of humans that everyone types of bodily structures will be created, so too the query of science and technology. Thus, the form of bridges, roads, buildings, heavy machinery, among others, that we will see in a society should inform, in a general way, the behavioral sample of the people. The behavioral sample may also tell lots about the volume to which the natural surroundings have been applied for infrastructural sports, technology, and generation. Above all, the behavioral pattern may want to inform plenty approximately the perceptions and information of the humans approximately other people.
I do believe – and, I assume, most people do accept as true with – that upon accelerating the price of infrastructural sports and generation, the environment has to recede in its naturalness. Once advancing generation (and its attendant systems or thoughts) competes with the green environment for space, this environment that houses timber, grass, plant life, all sorts of animals and fish has to shrink in length. Yet the growth of populace, the relentless human craving for excellent life, they want to control existence without depending on the unpredictable condition of the herbal environment activate the usage of generation. Technology wants now not pose an unwarranted hazard to the herbal surroundings. It is the misuse of an era this is in question. While a society can also justly make use of generation to improve fine of lifestyles, its human beings additionally must ask: “how a whole lot of technology will we want to shield the herbal surroundings?” Suppose society Y blends the slight use of era with the herbal surroundings in order to offset the reckless destruction of the latter, then this kind of positioning prompts the point that society Y is a lover of the principle of stability. From this precept, one can boldly conclude that society Y favors balance greater than chaos, and has, therefore, the sense of ethical and social obligation. Any latest era factors to the sophistication of the human mind, and it suggests that the herbal surroundings have been cavalierly tamed.
If humans do not need to stay at the mercy of the natural surroundings – which, of course, is an uncertain manner of life – however in step with their own anticipated pace, then the usage of generation is an issue of the route. It might seem that the principle of stability that society Y has selected should best be for a short whilst or that that is more of a make-consider function than an actual one. For while the strength of the human thoughts gratifies itself following a momentous success in era, retreat, or, at satisfactory, a slow-down is pretty unusual. It is as though the human thoughts is telling itself: “technological advancement has to accelerate without any obstruction. A retreat or a slow system is an insult to the inquiring thoughts.” This sort of thought process simplest points out the enigma of the mind, its darkish side, now not its greatest vicinity. And in seeking to interrogate the present mode of a certain generation in keeping with the commands of the thoughts, the function of ethics is critical.
Is it morally right to use this sort of technology for this sort of product? And is it morally right to use this type of product? Both questions trace that the product or products in the query are both harmful or not, environmentally pleasant or now not, or that they do no longer simplest cause damage at once to humans however without delay to the environment too. And if, as I even have said, the cause of generation is to improve the excellent of existence, then to use era to provide products that damage each human beings and the herbal environment contradicts the reason of era, and it also falsifies an announcement that human beings are rational. Furthermore, it shows that the state-of-the-art level that the human thoughts have reached is not able to grasp the essence or reason of quality lifestyles. In this regard, a nonviolent coexistence with the herbal environment might be abandoned for the sake of an unrestrained, inquiring human thought. The human thoughts might, as it has been, end up corrupted by ideas or thoughts which are untenable in any quantity of ways.
The advocacy this is completed via environmentalists relate to the query of environmental degradation and its terrible consequences on humans. They insist that there’s no justification for generating excessive-tech products that harm each human and the natural environment. This competition sounds persuasive. High generation may additionally show the peak of human accomplishment, however, it could not point to ethical and social duty. And up to now, the query may be asked: “In what approaches can humans close the chasm between unrestrained excessive generation and environmental degradation?”